Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, holding that the EPA’s use of cost-benefit analysis was based on a reasonable construction of the Act and therefore was permissible under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the US Supreme Court held that a claim that a government regulation does not substantially advance a legitimate state interest was grounded in Due Process concerns, not takings. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the US Supreme Court held that a claim that a government regulation does not substantially advance a legitimate state interest is grounded in Due Process concerns, not takings. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 1:10 pm by John Elwood
McDonough, 21-972Issues: (1) Whether the doctrine of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 am
In holding that the Final Rules are ultra vires, the court made no effort to measure the Final Rules against the actual terms of Section 2(b)(2), nor did the court give the USPTO's interpretation of that provision the deference required by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:15 am by Simon Lester
Our analysis proceeds under the two-part test explained in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm by Keith Rizzardi
9 is ambiguous, that we must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:38 pm by Jeff Kern and Kate Ross
See Brief for Respondent at 3, Digital Realty Trust, No. 16-1276 (2018); see also Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:35 am by Anne B. Sekel
Specifically, the court held that the DOL’s interpretation of “salesman” was not to be given deference under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]