Search for: "Childs v. Clements"
Results 61 - 80
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, and representing the federal government and defending that power will be U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: City of San Clemente v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
The appeals court vacated the lower court’s grant of summary judgment for the corporate parent (EEOC v Simbaki, Ltd, September 17, 2014, Clement, E). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
The Prince case upheld a statutory ban on child labor, where the child's parent argued that she had a constitutional right to use her child to sell religious literature. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
Clement, at the time the Solicitor General, took part in the oral argument on Oct. 10. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Title: Ozuna v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And Paul Clement, now of the boutique firm Clement & Murphy, is seated at the second case counsel table to await argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 11:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
” The juvenile court failed to take into account that the child had also recently been molested by an older child, and that “[h]er repeated statements about abuse were strikingly similar to descriptions of that” incident. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
