Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., No. 05-75295, 05-76217, 05-77116 Six restrictions on expressive activity promulgated and enforced by two California shopping malls infringe on the free speech rights guaranteed by the California State Constitution, and therefore interfere with protected union activity in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when applied to union picketing and handbilling actions. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
Haning, Flahavan, Kelly, et al., California Practice Guide - Personal Injury (Rutter 2006) §5:138, likewise states: Neither C.C.P. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
" South Bay Chevrolet v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Wilder, No. 06-2213 Conviction for possession, transmission, and receipt of child pornography is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) the warrant permitting seizure of materials from his home was issued without probable cause; 2) the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish his knowingly receipt or knowingly possession of child pornography; and 3) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the photographs on which the convictions were based depicted… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Miller, No. 06-5187 Conviction and sentence for receiving child pornography, possessing the same images of child pornography, and marijuana possession is vacated and remanded for re-sentencing where: 1) although defendant's conviction for receiving child pornography was supported by substantial evidence, double jeopardy barred convictions for both receiving and possessing the same images of child pornography; and 2) defendant's testimony regarding his… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole, No. 05-4200 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit brought by an anonymous plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from aspects of Pennsylvania's Registration of Sexual Offenders Act, or Megan's Law, a judgment finding that the treatment of out-of-state offenders under the law violates the Equal Protection Clause is affirmed where: 1) although Pennsylvania's interest in protecting its citizens from sexually… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
California Appellate Districts, April 09, 2008 Salma v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” Challengers argue that the law is impermissibly extraterritorial because virtually all the pork consumed in California is raised outside the state. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
California State Council of Carpenters (1983) has standing to sue under federal antitrust laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
California Appellate Districts, December 16, 2008 Arcadia Dev. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:12 pm
Supreme Court decided in Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
