Search for: "Christopher v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm by Nicole D. Prysby
” These declarations alleged only “possible future injury” and failed to establish a substantial risk of harm (Association for Accessible Medicines v. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s obviousness finding predicated on erroneous claim construction was reversed and the case remanded (MTD Products Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:50 am by Cheryl Beise
Finally, the Board did not abuse its discretion by declining to consider an untimely argument made by the petitioner (Henny Penny Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Esbeck, The Free Exercise Clause, Its Original Public Meaning, and the Reconsideration of Employment Division of Oregon v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:53 am by Brian Craig
The Federal Circuit reversed the Board’s construction for the term “wherein the correspondence of blocks to zones is adjustable by controller” in the patent claims and the Board’s conclusion about a limitation in the patent claims based on prior art references (Innovative Memory Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Prosecutor Christopher Mattei was preaching to a packed house in the New Haven courtroom where Rowland stands trial. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:32 pm
Tax Commissioner, State of West Virginia; the AP's Christopher S. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:34 am by Cheryl Beise
” Judge Dyk would hear the decisions on the merits, rather than vacate them for a new hearing before a new panel below (BedGear, LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am by George Basharis
The federal district court in Minnesota properly denied Bombardier’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, the Federal Circuit ruled, rejecting Bombardier’s contention that the strength of its evidence was sufficient to nullify the jury’s verdict (Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. [read post]