Search for: "Christopher v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, former State Department consular officer Christopher Richardson casts doubt on the validity of the visa-waiver process the government has relied to defend its position in Trump v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court decision [in Janus v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
Note: This is an experimental* guest post by one of my favorite criminal law journalists, Christopher Moraff, who writes on the intersection of policing, criminal justice, drug policy and civil liberties. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:32 am by Ben
” In 2014, SMASH 137 participated in an art project called the “Z Garage” in Detroit, Michigan USA. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies, Council on Foreign Relations (Testimony)·         Joel Wuthnow, Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, National Defense University (Testimony)·         Daniel Kliman, Senior Fellow, Asia-Pacific Security Program, Center for a New American Security (Testimony)1:00 PM – 2:00… [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
USA Socially Aware has posted on key areas for focus in US social media law in 2018. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Christopher Tayback, Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Oliver & Hedges, Los Angeles, California, for amicus National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
CHL's author informed conference participants that the case is innovative because it applies the USA PATRIOT Act to claim ownership of ISIS (aka ISIL) cultural property, ensuring that these conflict artifacts will not circulate in the marketplace and [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Christopher Elmendorf and Eric McGhee respond to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s complaint at last week’s oral argument in Gill v. [read post]