Search for: "Church v. Grant County"
Results 61 - 80
of 531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 2:21 pm
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Kansas City in Kansas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
Yesterday, the Court granted cert. on the thrice-relisted Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:52 am
(One reason for granting review was that the Court of Appeal had left it up to the lower courts whether to apply neutral principles or not, and remain with the old "deference" standard of Watson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
" Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm
Haskell County Board of Commissioners, 574 F.3d 1235 (2009) he wrote a dissent from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a case in which a 3-judge panel had held that a Ten Commandments display outside a county court house violated the Establishment Clause.⇾In Abdulhaseeb v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:39 pm
Citizens for a Better Flathead v Flathead Board of County Commissioners, 2016 WL 7239506 (MT 12/13/2016)Filed under: Amending Zoning, Current Caselaw, Uncategorized [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:07 pm
Supreme Court-- Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:11 am
In Davis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:01 am
Governmental immunity LUBBOCK COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND TOMMY FISHER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LUBBOCK COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
In the case of Slavinski v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Wakulla County Florida, (ND FL, July 9, 2020), a Florida federal district court granted a preliminary injunction requiring county officials to allow a church to operate a religious transition home for 3 to 6 unrelated adults. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
”) Board of County Com’rs of Van Wert Cty. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 6:29 pm
The Supreme Court gives RLUIPA a broad interpretation in Holt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
The en banc Fourth Circuit gives us another example, in Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
” Summary judgment for the county was affirmed on the employee’s retaliation claim (Davis v Fort Bend County, August 26, 2014, Prado, E). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:46 pm
After Mesquite applied for permits to develop land zoned for church use, the Inspector determined that Mesquite’s proposed use did not meet the Pima County zoning code’s definition of “church. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:14 am
In Hake v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
