Search for: "Church v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm
In response to this conundrum, American courts have oscillated between two judicial postures that the United States Supreme Court has found to be constitutionally permissible: (1) the “compulsory deference” method preferred in the 1871 case Watson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Northshore United Church of Christ, (WA Sup. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
United States. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
United States.] [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:05 am
Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, et al. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:41 am
” The point was not that the soldier was gay (he was not), but that God is punishing the United States for its policy with regard to gays. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
In Pennington v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
United States decided. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
For Constitutional Law buffs, on Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Snyder v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 3:50 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Yesterday Americans United announced that it has filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a resident of Johnson County, Tennessee who sought to have the county display two posters on the separation of church and state in the lobby of the county court house. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:27 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
The church conceived, organized and ran the campaign.This matter first came to Americans United’s attention in July of 2011. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
A split among the United States Courts of Appeal between the “broad” and “narrow” interpretations of the exemption had left plan sponsors and participants in an uncertain state where the applicable plan was maintained by a church-affiliated group and not established by the church itself. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:17 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
