Search for: "Citibank v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The twin purposes of the doctrine are to protect the integrity of the judicial process and to protect judicial integrity by avoiding the risk of inconsistent results in two proceedings'” (Davis v Citibank, N.A. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
TAGS: CFPB, Citibank, federal-enforcement-actions, student-loan - reposted 11/21/17Cousins v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Collection Serv.)FDCPA, federal-laws-relevant-to-debt-collection, judgment-execution-garnishment, unfair-debt-collection - 11/22/17CFPB takes action against Citibank over faults in Student Loan Servicing (press release re-post) CFPB, Citibank, federal-enforcement-actions, student-loan - 11/21/17Cousins v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The account at issue in Madden v Midland involved an open-end credit card plan (aka credit card account) and the account was not sold by Bank of America to an unaffiliated national bank, contrary representation by the Curious authors notwithstanding. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Wolfgang Demino
  THE CAST OF PLAYERS OWNER TRUSTEE: Wilmington Trust Company is a Delaware banking corporation with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 9:47 am by Allan Blutstein
FDIC (D.D.C.) -- deciding that agency failed to show that withheld records concerning Citibank were properly withheld under Exemptions 4, 5, or 8, and ordering agency to submit revised Vaughn Index and/or declarations.Shapiro v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:42 am by Jeremy A. Gunn
Citibank, 2 Cal. 5th 945, 393 P.3d 85, 2017 WL 1279700, at *1 (2017), the court unanimously ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not preempt this state-law rule under AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]