Search for: "Citizens Action, Etc. v. Public Service, Etc." Results 61 - 80 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 6:20 am by INFORRM
The need for a public body to be identified when acting in respect of citizens is important. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
NCSC’s Center for Jury Studies would like to create a gallery of resources (e.g., posters, scripts for public service announcements or op-ed articles, presentations to local community groups, etc.), and an archive of stories that can be used by state courts to promote citizen participation in jury service. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Even absence of explicit falsity can be misleading overall and potentially harmful to public health by series of statements each true on its own but misleading overall in combination w/omissions. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Over thirty years ago, Chief Justice Dickson for the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Action Travail des Femmes v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
There is a welter of debate and criminal legislation behind public protest action and this or that provision that authorises arrest. [read post]
The test balances (1) the employee’s interests as a citizen versus (2) the state’s interest in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its workers. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Unlike earlier generations, many senior citizens are retiring with large amounts of debt including a mortgage. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:29 am by Brett Trout
The Fourth Amendment deals with restricting the government from invading the privacy of American citizens, through eavesdropping, video surveillance, improper searches, etc. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
  Mossoff's article is written in the wake of Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]