Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional, et al. v. United States, et al." Results 61 - 80 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) when the state is acting on its own behalf and exercising its discretion in deciding to pursue licensing for a hydroelectric dam project? [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
On October 31, the European Union and the United States agreed on temporary measures to settle their dispute over US Section 232 national security tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Rosanna Smart et al., The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
FPC American Victory Fund, et al., the Second Amendment Foundation, et al., and the NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund provide interpretations of the amendment’s language. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:56 am by Eric Goldman
In July, Trump et al sued Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube in Florida for terminating his accounts. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]