Search for: "City and County of Denver v. District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 2:10 am
"We are demanding the city and county of Denver comply with the law like any other defendant," Senior U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
In NAACP of Camden County East v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:10 am
District Court for City and County of Denver, 718 P.2d 1044, 1047 (Colo. 1986) (insurer may not avail itself of the protection “simply because it hired attorneys to perform the factual investigation into whether the claim should be paid. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:10 am
District Court for City and County of Denver, 718 P.2d 1044, 1047 (Colo. 1986) (insurer may not avail itself of the protection “simply because it hired attorneys to perform the factual investigation into whether the claim should be paid. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
LaCabe is a former ex officio sheriff and Manager of Safety for the City and County of Denver who was in charge of issuing the licenses, denied Peterson's request and has since retired. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
LaCabe is a former ex officio sheriff and Manager of Safety for the City and County of Denver who was in charge of issuing the licenses, denied Peterson’s request and has since retired. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:05 am
City and County of Denver, 2011 U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
" However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church & State v… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Click Here Other Articles on the Same Topic: Settlement Reached with City and County of Honolulu to Address Wastewater Collection & Treatment Systems. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
An earlier Colorado Supreme Court case, City and County of Denver v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here District Court approves consent decree between feds, Mobil Oil. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
District Court Judge Frederick J. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
District Court in Sacramento, resolves certain federal claims against El Dorado County for clean up of the Meyers Landfill site. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Fitzpatrick is to appear in Monroe County court on June 28, 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:24 am
City and County of Denver, the district court judge denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and specifically held that time spent by patrol officers “donning and doffing” the equipment and uniform that are explicitly prescribed in the operations manual for the officers is compensable work time. [read post]
