Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
" Likewise, the court in San Diego County Employees Retirement Association v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
" Likewise, the court in San Diego County Employees Retirement Association v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 329-330 (my April 5, 2019 post on which can be found here) in setting out the general CEQA principles and standards governing its review in a case challenging an EIR’s content and analysis. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 663-671; Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 169, 1977.) [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 141 Cal. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 498, 515), it is well established that courts in such actions have inherent power in appropriate circumstances to remand to the agency for further proceedings prior to entering a final judgment. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 498, 515), it is well established that courts in such actions have inherent power in appropriate circumstances to remand to the agency for further proceedings prior to entering a final judgment. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Box 2210 in San Francisco. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Richfield Company, et. al., is making headlines this week as expert witness testimony is being heard in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Id.Agent Carlson sought a warrant to search the phone from an Alameda County Superior Court (California) judge. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
Superior Court, 9 Cal.5th 279 (2020). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am
California Highway Patrol, filed in a California Superior Court in San Francisco, asking a state judge to bar the highway patrol from seizing cash and other properties from employees of a marijuana delivery company based in Hubmolt County to the Los Angeles area last year. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:14 pm
City and County of San Francisco (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 893, 910.) [read post]
