Search for: "City of Birmingham v. Long" Results 61 - 80 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
(Akinbolu v Hackney Borough Council (1997) 29 HLR 259 and Birmingham City Council v Qasim & Ors (2009) EWCA Civ 1080 (our note)). [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
State's Ultimate Insider Indicted, by Jeff Coen, Ray Long and John ChaseChicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 2008). [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
A person who discriminated on the ground of race, as defined by the Act, could not pray in aid the fact that the ground of discrimination was one mandated by religion (R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission (No1) (1989) AC 1155 HL and James v Eastleigh BC (1990) 2 AC 751 HL). [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
  Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
  Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Its deficiencies were acknowledged in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, para 46. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:43 am by Tessa Shepperson
Case law has been updated throughout, including a last minute note on Tomlinson v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8, a Supreme Court decision on whether the housing duty under the Housing Act 1996 was a civil right for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998, which was only handed down in February 2010. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is not an unusual feature of long-term illnesses, and LAC 93 (10) paragraph 2(5) expressly approved the provision of accommodation for the purpose of caring for those who are ill. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
This is going to be a very short post on a very long judgment – 275 paragraphs worth. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Giles Peaker
The Homeless Code of Guidance at 17.45, art.2 of the Homelessness Suitability of Accommodation Order 1996 and the decision of the Supreme Court in Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 (our note), considered together, meant that “in considering whether a property is suitable, affordability is one of the issues in question and that a housing authority must take into account whether accommodation is affordable, including taking account of the financial… [read post]