Search for: "City of Commerce City v. Cooper"
Results 61 - 80
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
The most notable is in Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
” (e-commerce@its.best.uk, Cabinet Office 1999.)So long as those harnessed to the task of implementing policy don’t kick over the traces, the uncertain business of persuading a democratically elected legislature to enact a law is avoided.The Communication displays no enthusiasm for Article 15. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(2) Is the enactment of a zoning ordinance allowing the operation of medical marijuana cooperatives in certain areas the type of activity that may cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment? [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
Dorsen wrote his latest book with the cooperation of the justice. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
(remanding for full hearing on equitable tolling); Cooper v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
GC decides in Excalibur City v EUIPOMarques 46 explains two decisions (Cases T-565/15 and T-566/15) on 20th September 2016 in Excalibur City v EUIPO, where the EU General Court disagreed with the EUIPO's Board of Appeal and found that there was no likelihood of confusion between applications for the mark MERLIN'S KINDERWELT and two earlier Italian trade marks for KINDER owned by Ferrero. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Suppose that NFIB v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
” Dragline responds, anointing himself as Luke’s “official egg peeler,” and tells “Society,” in one of the best lines of the film: “You just may be great at hanging paper around big cities. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Ash v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm
Philadelphia City Solicitor Shelley R. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
As to the former, the opinion explains that[Heleniak] was charged with transportation of child pornography in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
