Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles (1983)" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and its officials. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by Aaron
Storch, one of the “most infamous jailhouse informants in Los Angeles history. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:37 am by Russ Bensing
Only one decision out of DC, Los Angeles County v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Los Angeles County v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:24 am by Abbott & Kindermann
LEXIS 18838, Johnny Anderson, a tattooist operating in City of Los Angeles, desired to open a parlor in this beach city. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:13 am
”Acknowledging the 6th Circuit’s ruling, the Ninth Circuit court noted that in Gonzalez v Spencer, 336 F.3d 832, a different panel of the 9th Circuit held that a private attorney representing a county was not entitled to qualified immunity.The defendant in Gonzales was a private attorney retained to defend Los Angeles County in an underlying civil rights suit brought by the plaintiff.In rejecting the attorney’s claim of qualified… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Jamie C. Chanin
County of Los Angeles, 166 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1284 (2008) (noting a contract existed because the board set compensation terms by expressly adopting memorandum of understanding through a resolution); Glendale City Employees’ Assoc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Saito, 47, a criminal prosecutor for the Los Angeles city attorney's office in Van Nuys. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
Title: City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Click Here BP in talks to settle Texas City fine -OSHA memo. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 162 BC: Eleazar Maccabeus was crushed to death at the Battle of Beth-zechariah by a War elephant that he believed to be carrying Seleucid King Antiochus V; charging in to battle, Eleazar rushed underneath the elephant and thrust a spear into its belly, whereupon it fell dead on top of him * 4 BC: Herod the Great suffered from fever, intense rashes, colon pains, foot drop, inflammation of the abdomen, a putrefaction of his genitals that produced worms, convulsions, and difficulty… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:53 pm
County of Los Angeles, No. 05-56467 California's maintenance of the California's Child Abuse Central Index (CACI), which is a database of known or suspected child abusers, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because identified individuals are not given a fair opportunity to challenge the allegations against them. . [read post]