Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
  More recently these laws spread to municipalities throughout the state (see, e.g., Horton v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Sacramento Bee, Elissa Graves looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:42 am by Ted Frank
Tags: California, deep pocket, jackpot justice, noneconomic damages, pedestrian, personal responsibility, vicarious liability Related posts Carelessness for millions in New York City (15) Driver falls asleep: jury blames Ford to tune of $61M (14) December 2 roundup (1) City streets not safe to drive 100-120 mph on (6) Weidner v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
Each of California's 58 counties - including Sacramento, Placer, Yolo, and El Dorado locally - has its own superior court, which is where people are charged with violation of state and local laws, and trials are held. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
 Instead of applying the strict liability test, the California courts apply a reasonableness standard to these state actions. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]