Search for: "Clarence Bader" Results 61 - 80 of 1,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
With the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who provided a necessary vote to the McGirt majority, and the confirmation of her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the state is now asking the court to reverse itself. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm by Mark Walsh
Two of the three lawyers arguing today clerked on the high court (Prelogar for Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, and Stewart for Justice Clarence Thomas). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm by Mark Walsh
With Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death last year, and the court finally back on the bench, Breyer has moved to the seat on the left of Roberts. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
Only Justice Clarence Thomas, the court’s prolific author of solo concurrences, wrote more opinions than Sotomayor this term. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:51 am by Amy Howe
He was joined by the other two liberal justices, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, as well as four conservatives: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:22 am by Marcia Coyle
Justice Anthony Kennedy, author of the University of Texas ruling, has retired, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in the majority, has died. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:14 pm by Amy Howe
” The conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, Breyer emphasized, is a “very, very decent person. [read post]
19 May 2021, 7:22 am by James Romoser
(Zoe Tillman & Ema O’Connor, Buzzfeed News) Supreme Court throws abortion fight into center of midterms (David Crary & Jill Colvin, Associated Press) Supreme Court Delights Conservatives With Action on Wish List (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg) Climate Cases Face More Delay After Big Oil’s High Court Win (Ellen Gilmber & Jennifer Hijazi, Bloomberg Law) Remembering Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court Historical Society) The post The morning read for… [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:32 am by Eugene Volokh
For a recent law journal article on this topic, we found "nigger" quoted in more than 9,500 opinions written since 2000 by jurists as varied as Sandra Day O'Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Clarence Thomas (plus thousands of lower court judges). [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:59 am by Kalvis Golde
Three of the top six pairs include Barrett – so far she has voted alongside both Gorsuch and Justice Clarence Thomas in every case that she has participated in, and she has agreed with Justice Samuel Alito 95% of the time. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:17 am by Marcia Coyle
Mississippi, Kennedy and liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg were no longer on the court. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:50 am by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court’s decision not to take up at least one of the 10 cases. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am by John Elwood
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg indicated that she voted to grant review, and Thomas dissented again, writing that “Feres was wrongly decided. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:04 am by Marcia Coyle
In a 2019 order denying review in another Feres case, one involving medical malpractice, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that she would have granted review. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 9:07 pm by Safaa Aly
In the California and Nevada cases, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg provided the fifth vote needed to uphold the state regulations. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am by Marcia Coyle
Justice Barrett, in her first written opinion since joining the court, said she agreed with Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito Jr., who stated that all limits should be lifted, but she had one exception—the ban on singing. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:59 pm by Barbara Moreno
Corey Robin, The Enigma of Clarence Thomas (2019). 11. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
  Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, has already opined that “there is a strong likelihood that the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. [read post]