Search for: "Clark, III v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 9:59 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Clark’s book, “The Law of Nations and the United States Constitution”—I describe the state of the field and argue that federal common law should govern many immunity-related issues. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(iii) When the offense in respect of which extradition is requested is of a political character, or the person whose extradition is requested proves that the extradition request has been made for the purpose of trying or punishing him for an offense of the above-mentioned character. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:09 am
An attorney's advice sent by one layperson to another layperson not an attorney-client communication subject to a FOIL exceptionMatter of Siani v Clark, 2009 NY Slip Op 50906(U), Decided on April 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Justice Henry F. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:44 am by Sean Wajert
Thus, for the same reasons they lacked Article III standing, they failed to state a claim for those types of claims as well. [read post]