Search for: "Clark v. State of California" Results 61 - 80 of 514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Morgan Kousser, Emeritus, California Institute of Technology, have signed a Historians’ Amicus Brief in Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:40 am by Todd Henderson
Hall, an employee of the state of Nevada allegedly harmed the plaintiffs in an auto accident in California. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society podcast with Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Supreme Court case of Packingham v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
    California law guarantees lunch breaks for hourly workers in California. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:01 pm by Kent Scheidegger
§ 1983 challenging Section 647(b) of the California Penal Code, which criminalizes the commercial exchange of sexual activity.The panel first rejected plaintiffs' assertion that Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Michigan Supreme Court should uphold his First Amendment rights [Clark Neily and Jay Schweikert on Cato Institute brief in Michigan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
New York State Department of Correctional Services, 2010 U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm by Howard Friedman
Sullivan,(9th Cir., April 12, 2017), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's RLUIPA complaint regarding restrictions on the wearing of dreadlocks.In Clark v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:45 pm by Seth Davis
To my mind, the highlight was the filing of a petition by seventeen states in Case No. 22-1081, Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm by Juliana
In the appointment letter, Kosinki designates Burns to “perform the duties of United States District Judge temporarily for the District of Arizona for the specific case United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”But if Tony Clark’s case is any indication, the Mississippi prosecutors and the state supreme court did not get the message. [read post]