Search for: "Clark v. Woods"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Ex Parte Wood & Brundage, 22 U.S. 603 (1824) McCormick Harvesting Mach. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Clark, 767 A.2d 303 (Me., 2001) (the Maine recreational use statute does not apply to a claim alleging negligent supervision and instruction on the use of a wood splitter.) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Williamson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
In Sequenom, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
The Ohio Willow Wood Company, No. 15-567 Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation, No. 14-10337 MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 am
., et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 12:23 am
Kat friend Aaron Wood has provided an edifying summary of a recent case from the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors [2015] EWHC 3407 (IPEC), concerning the vexing question that copyright practitioners know all too well: Who is the owner of the copyright in a recording where one party finances and the other is the creative/organiser? [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Rose, JD, MBA, Principal, Rachel V. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
., et al v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:03 am
., et al v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Clarke gave a concurri [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He preferred the approach of Richards LJ in R (C) who had also thought Wood was over-rigid and had been overtaken by Strasbourg database cases (such as Marper v UK) in which REP was not used as a litmus. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:41 am
Ryan v. [read post]