Search for: "Clayton Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2023, 9:00 am by Tom Clarkson
Between 2015 and 2022, former SEC Chair Clayton focused more on “main street” investors; with the change in leadership, the focus is now more on the private funds industry. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
Earlier this month, the DOJ announced that five directors resigned from four corporate boards and one company declined to exercise board appointment rights in response to the Antitrust Division’s efforts to enforce Section 8 of the Clayton Act’s prohibition on interlocking directorates. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
But most importantly, the individual investors – who former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton liked to call Mr. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm by Race to the Bottom
A corporation with a subscription pays the same rate regardless of the number of claims arbitrated. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:15 am by Jay L. Levine
Instead of a three-tier fee structure, the FTC now moves to a six-tier structure, as follows: Filing Fee Transaction Value $30,000 Less than $161.5 million $100,000 $161.5 million to less than $500 million $250,000 $500 million to less than $1 billion $400,000 $1 billion to less than $2 billion $800,000 $2 billion to less than $5 billion $2.25 million $5 billion+   Interlocking directorates Section 8 of the Clayton Act generally prohibits one person from serving as a director or… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Nine months ago, we wrote about a 20% shareholder, Alvin Clayton Fernandes, whose bare bones petition Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Frank P. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
I’m happy to say that his legacy of combating corporate corruption and promoting integrity in our markets lives on today. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under the new thresholds, a transaction is reportable if, due to the transaction, the acquiring person will hold voting securities, assets, or non-corporate interests valued over $111.4 million. [read post]
Higher Thresholds For the Prohibition Against Interlocking Directorates Higher thresholds for the prohibition in Section 8 of the Clayton Act against interlocking directorates became effective on January 23, 2023. [read post]
Higher Thresholds For the Prohibition Against Interlocking Directorates Higher thresholds for the prohibition in Section 8 of the Clayton Act against interlocking directorates became effective on January 23, 2023. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In general, Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits a person from simultaneously serving on the board or as an officer of two competing corporations unless the criteria for de minimis exceptions are met. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
In lieu of our regular Friday feature—the Week in Review—The Regulatory Review is recapping some of the top regulatory news from the past year, including major U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Microsoft Corporation Complaint to Prohibit the Acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft corporation in Violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
FOOTNOTES [1] Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits any person from simultaneously serving as an officer or director of two competing corporations under certain circumstances. [read post]
Third, the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 empowered the FTC, in addition to other pro-competition duties, to prevent and eliminate unlawful corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
 Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 21 November 2022, judgment was handed down in Wellington v Metcalf [2022] VCC 1759 by Clayton J. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
Clayton County, which held that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:18 pm by Leo Caseria and Malika Levarlet
” The Statement asserts that, in enacting Section 5, Congress’s objective was to create a new prohibition broader than, and different from, the Sherman and Clayton Acts. [read post]