Search for: "Clear v. Patterson"
Results 61 - 80
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2016, 7:40 am
See, e.g., Patterson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
… the clear and necessary implication … is that Parliament intended EU rights to have effect in domestic law and that this effect should not be capable of being undone or overridden by action taken by the Crown in exercise of its prerogative powers. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:41 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
"] Last month, the Supreme Court denied cert in Patterson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
The court denied review in the serially rescheduled and relisted Patterson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 12:30 pm
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Patterson: Not with my generation, no. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:54 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held, in Patterson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Patterson case. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Patterson case. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:01 pm
” Patterson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
I just wanted to have it clear in my own head.State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:48 am
Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
Patterson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Michael Helfand writes that by asking for the views of the solicitor general last week in Patterson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
Patterson, it is necessary to go back a ways, to the Texas Supreme Court case of Luttes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:24 am
Patterson, 472 F.3d 767, 776 (10th Cir. 2006). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm
Hogan v. [read post]
