Search for: "Clift v. Clift"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
In particular, in W v Westminster([2005] EWHC 102 (QB)) and Clift v Slough BC [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) he provided remedies to claimants against public authorities in circumstances where the application of conventional libel principles might have appeared to lead to their refusal. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In particular, in W v Westminster ([2005] EWHC 102 (QB)) and Clift v Slough BC [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) he provided remedies to claimants against public authorities in circumstances where the application of conventional libel principles might have appeared to lead to their refusal. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
In Martin v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am
News from UNCITRAL Jenny Clift, International Insolvency Law: the UNCITRAL Experience with Harmonisation and Modernisation Techniques. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment remains outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media and related cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Ambrosiadou v Coward, heard 21, 22 June and 8 July 2010 (Eady J) Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
Next Week in the Courts Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media and related cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 25 and 26 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls and Moore-Bick and Moses LJJ) Ambrosiadou v Coward, heard 21 and 22 June 2010 (Eady J) Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
In the Courts On 23 and 24 June 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ) heard the defendants’ appeal against the decision of Tugendhat J in Clift v Slough BC ([2009] EWHC 1150 (QB)). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
On 22 or 23 June 2010, the Court of Appeal (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ) will hear the defendants’ appeal against the decision of Tugendhat J in Clift v Slough BC ([2009] EWHC 1150 (QB)) Judgment in British Broadcasting Corporation -v- Sugar heard on 17 May 2010 by Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ will be given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
Kentucky and oral argument in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
In May v Ballston Spa Central School District, 170 AD2d 920, the court was asked to determine the right of an employee to the cash value of his or her accrued, but unused, vacation time in a situation where the employer denied the employee the opportunity to use such credits during his or her period of employment and the employee is then terminated.In finding in favor of May, the Appellate Division considered two cases: Hess v Board of Education, 41 AD2d 151 and Clift… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Henry v BBC [2006] EWHC 386 (QB). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Clift v Slough Borough Council [2009] EWHC 1550 considers the extent to which a local authority has an interest or duty to pass on allegations about anti-social behaviour to its employees and contractors for the purposes of the defence of qualified to a claim for defamation. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
Clift, 2007 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:09 am
Taveras v. [read post]
