Search for: "Cochrane v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 6:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
"A pardon is an act of grace," wrote John Marshall in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Cochran, 544 U.S. 734 (2005), the Supreme Court was set to consider the issue, but ended up not deciding it because the plaintiff died while the case was pending. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am by INFORRM
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley United States: Facebook, Cyberbullying and the First Amendment – Susan Brenner So, welcome back to our readers. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]