Search for: "Code v. City of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 1,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
(That pretty much combusted.)# # #DECISIONMatter of Board of Mgrs. of Franklin Place Condominium v New York City Fire Dept. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] affirmed so much of a determination of a hearing officer, as, after a hearing, found that Petitioner in the administrative appeal violated Administrative Code of the City of New York §28-210.3 and directed the petitioner to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for a period of 39 days.The Appellate Division confirmed OATH's ruling "on the merits,"… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] affirmed so much of a determination of a hearing officer, as, after a hearing, found that Petitioner in the administrative appeal violated Administrative Code of the City of New York §28-210.3 and directed the petitioner to pay a civil penalty of $1,000 per day for a period of 39 days.The Appellate Division confirmed OATH's ruling "on the merits,"… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad Introduction National Museum in Sweden, National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, National Gallery in London, Louvre… climate protestors have been increasingly frequenting art museums. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board, a publisher challenged New York's "Son of Sam" law, which required convicted criminals to forfeit any profits from depictions of their crimes. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seattle Times – Trip Gabriel (New York Times) | Published: 10/7/2023 Americans are increasingly fracturing as a people, and some are taking the extraordinary step of moving to escape a political or social climate they abhor. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
  We also received traffic from respected organizations like the American Bar Association, Pro Publica, and the American Civil Liberties Union, as well as popular media outlets such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR, CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Avianca Inc , Judge Castel in the Southern District of New York sanctioned two New York lawyers and their law firm for $5000 for submitting a brief citing fake cases generated by ChatGPT. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am by centerforartlaw
About the Author Kouros is a recent graduate from New York University’s College of Arts and Science with a BA in Art History and Political Science. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
” [Administrative Code § 7-201(c)(2)]Seems like RDW tripped up, again.# # #DECISIONW. v New York City Dept. of Transp. [read post]