Search for: "Coffin v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:42 pm
Bauman, and Walden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
With cause, Gideon likes to quote this passage from Justice White's* opinion for a unanimous court in Coffin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 2:21 pm
Once upon a midnight dreary, in the annus horribilis of 2000, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued its terrifying decision in what is the seminal artificial vampire fangs case entitled Nutting v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:26 pm
Jones v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
The Organization for an International Geographical Indications Network (oriGIn), a producers’ group lobbying in favour of GI, has issued a preliminary list of candidate GIs in the United States, just ahead of a the WIPO Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System meeting. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Coffin of the U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 3:13 pm
In conclusion, it should also be noted that ELIC-related litigation continued in 2012 (Garamendi v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3 and 3551 et seq.)" [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See also Coffin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
” Coffin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:23 am
Case materials in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:00 am
The government objects to the defendants' efforts to scuttle the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
" Despite several more arguments from Helena Rubinstein and L'Oreal regarding the admissibility of Allergan's evidence of BOTOX's reputation, the General Court dismissed them all and stated: "the size of the market share of BOTOX in the United Kingdom, 74.3% in 2003, like the degree of awareness of the trade mark of 75% among the specialised public accustomed to pharmaceutical treatments against wrinkles, is sufficient to… [read post]
