Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2014, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:07 am
In my post, I stated that “Coke could register these marks if it disclaimed protection to ZERO alone. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:00 pm
Coke is available here. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:30 am
” Eventually, New Coke was renamed “Coke II” and is, according to Coca-Cola Company itself, no longer available in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
Circling back to the Coke's marks, we reiterate the assumption that the hashtag serves to direct consumer traffic to Coca-Cola’s social networks. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Virginia and Daubert v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
Oshana v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:02 pm
Another case, Coke Oven Envt'l Task Force v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:29 pm
They already have reasonable Freedom of Speech protections (First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:40 am
United States, the crack v. powdered cocaine sentencing case. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:08 am
The first case, Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:49 am
Judge Friedman's full opinion in US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 3:07 pm
In 2005, the Supreme Court generated widespread outrage when it ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
FN4 The newsletter stated that Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:20 am
See State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
We aren’t saying everything is off limits, just that there should be mirror of state preemption.RT: I couldn’t distinguish Coke’s position from the 9th Circuit’s. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Swain v. [read post]
