Search for: "Com. v. Burden, J." Results 61 - 68 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am by Marty Schwimmer
For purposes of determining whether an Internet site conducts business directed to residents of the United States under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission may consider, among other indicators, whether (i) the Internet site is providing goods or services to users located in the United States; (ii) there is evidence that the Internet site is not intended to provide goods and services to such users or access to or delivery of goods and services to such users; (iii) the Internet site has reasonable… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Scope of Liability             In the Illinois Supreme Court case, Karas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis was prepared by a select group of JD candidates at the Institute of International Economic Law (IIEL) at Georgetown University in conjunction with TradeLab. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  At least where a party is deliberately using another’s mark for commercial reasons, party has a soft burden to show that its use/type of use is worth preserving. [read post]