Search for: "Com. v. Cross" Results 61 - 80 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by Jon Katz
  – The meaning of a plea of no contest/nolo contendere is governed by Com. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  Hall contends that the judge was wrong about that, but the court holds that, to raise that issue, Hall should’ve cross-appealed; because she didn’t, the court won’t consider it… In State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Russ Bensing
  In the 1989 decision in Webster v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Last summer, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Almost two years ago, in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Massachusetts, was  that the  reliability of scientific evidence made cross-examination unnecessary. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The burden on COM’s cross motion shifted to the Sadiku’s, requiring them to submit evidence showing that there is an issue of fact which must be tried (see Alvarez v Prospect Hospital, supra). [read post]