Search for: "Com. v. Fair" Results 61 - 80 of 533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
  Pix Credit HERENorges Bank announced its decision to revoke the exclusion of Precious Shipping PCL from the Fund. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 1:50 am by JR Chaves
Afortunadamente, los principios constitucionales de la potestad sancionadora y la tutela judicial efectiva (arts.24 y 25 CE) propiciaron la expulsión de la abusiva condición de pagar para poder recurrir y quedó en sus justos términos: solo la firmeza de la sanción en vía administrativa abre la vía para su ejecutividad y cobro, y nunca condiciona la posibilidad de recurrir. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:15 am by Loletta Darden
Based on the Court’s decision in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Could make the entire survey about .com terms, so all the educational section and examples would be about .com. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
I suggested that young dogs might need to learn some old tricks to ensure fair and acceptable outcomes. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even if a competitor uses that term, provided it's done in good faith, they would most likely be protected by fair use. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even if a competitor uses that term, provided it's done in good faith, they would most likely be protected by fair use. [read post]