Search for: "Com. v. Foster"
Results 61 - 80
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Editor's NotesFor further insight, check out the Audio Brief of oral arguments in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Foster gave trial courts unfettered discretion in sentencing” was provided by a pair of 2nd District decisions, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:38 am
Foster. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:29 am
Last week’s 8th District decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Foster here and here.) [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:33 am
Clellan and State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
On the other hand, Scalia’s decision two years ago in Giles v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:42 am
Foster, to the US Supreme Court’s decision resurrecting judicial fact-finding for consecutive sentences in Oregon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
Ice overrules State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
Here are the facts in last week’s 8th District decision in Middleburg Heights v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
Although the court has resolutely adhered to the (false) idea that Foster gave trial courts unfettered discretion in sentencing, there was a glimmer of hope on the issue of disproportionality, with the court holding in both State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:32 am
” See also Com. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:14 am
Ice had implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
The court rejects that argument, as it has always done before, but in a footnote mentions that “The Ohio Supreme Court is expected to decide whether the Foster decision remains good law in light of Ice in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:45 am
CrimR 32(A)(4) and pre-Foster law would indicate that a judge does. [read post]
