Search for: "Com. v. Long, S." Results 61 - 80 of 899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/403(d) Once included in the divorce, the party will be ordered to compel production pursuant to the subpoena’s written request (so long as there is no pending objection). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
Some 38,000 owners were awarded $2,700 each; that’s a whopping $102.6 million in damages.Talk about getting souped up ….# # #SOURCE:https://www.law360.com/articles/1537233/breaking-gm-hit-with-over-100m-verdict-in-engine-defect-class-actionSiqueiros v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”# # #If you are a victim of discrimination (of any kind), please do not hesitate to reach out to one of our lawyers by calling 212-619-5400.# #To view a copy of the complaint form, click here: MYERS v, NASSAU COUNTY, et al# # #Media coverage about this lawsuit can be found here:Newsday article: https://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/nassau-police-discrimination-lawsuit-v76wlk52Bloomberg article:… [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
For example, the Scope 3 emissions disclosures seem to be based on general concern over climate accountability, rather than the company’s own long-term financial value. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:25 pm by Nena Eddy
While the term “environmental justice” is relatively new in Louisiana litigation, the court’s analysis roots this concept in the state’s long-established public trust doctrine. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the "seas" referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray's Lessee v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the “seas” referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If Fox is producing a story about a Californian, it will need to avoid including sufficiently intimate facts (at least so long as it worries that a judge and jury will find them not to be newsworthy), for fear that California law would apply.[16] Again, a state's law would thus have an extraterritorial effect on what Fox creates in New York and distributes throughout the country. [read post]