Search for: "Com. v. May"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
State Lands Com. (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476, 496.) [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
While the Draft Guidelines may be instructive, the antitrust agencies notably do not offer any bright lines about “how much”—and under what circumstances—horizontal shareholding may be illegal. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
The text follows below and the original may be accessed on the Corriente Agramontista wensite. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Even the Americans recognize that, as the title of a recent text posted to the United States Institute for Peace Website noted: "The New Nonaligned Movement Is Having a Moment" (May 2023). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
See Parts I, II, III, IV, and V. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
Com. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Universal Com. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
Com. *224. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Welfare Com. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
This creates inconsistencies between the scope of application of the Draft Directive and existing jurisdictional law, both on the EU level and on the domestic level, and can lead to an enforcement gap: EU companies may be able to escape the existing EU jurisdiction; non-EU companies may even not be subject to such jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Com., December 6, 2017, n° 15-19.726). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
In making those decisions, the com- mittee may consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
In making those decisions, the com- mittee may consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:35 am
English law has recognized certain instances—such as proprietary torts like trespass, breach of fiduciary duty, and “exceptional circumstances” like the infamous Blake v Attorney General case related to stripping the profits from a British-turned-Soviet spy’s autobiography—where compensation for loss may not be sufficient. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Hale's Com. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
One of the excuses the mayor of Portland is giving for not putting an ordinance in place prohibiting hard drug use in public places is that such an ordinance is, or at least may be, forbidden by state law. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
A rating obtained pursuant to the PDRS may be rebutted by showing an applicant’s diminished future earning capacity is greater than that reflected in the PDRS. ( Ogilvie v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
