Search for: "Com. v. Roberts, J." Results 61 - 80 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:09 pm
Mas o maior susto é quando eles vão devolver as chaves do imóvel à imobiliária e descobrem que precisam pagar uma multa rescisória, mesmo com o apartamento nesse estado. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:56 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
É preciso ter atenção na hora de postar fotos, vídeos e, principalmente, expressar opiniões na web que possam ser comprometedoras com a conduta de um profissional. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
O evento contou com a participação de várias autoridades, advogados e profissionais da área. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  And yesterday in KRE v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]