Search for: "Common Cause, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
David Strauss is the Gerald Ratner Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
In the late 1800s, magazines published by labor unions were common. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Although the text of the MMWA did not specifically address the validity of pre-dispute mandatory binding arbitration, Congress expressly delegated rulemaking authority under the statue to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
While clearly stating that the private right to own property is constitutionally granted, a further reading of Dorrance identifies three ways property can constitutionally be affected: (1) by the parties, either by stipulation between the legislature and the proprietor of the land; (2) by commission mutually elected by the parties; or (3) by the intervention of a jury.10 The court also notes that the legislature may resort to the process of taking for “public exigencies. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator Kim Carr… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
As Eugene Soltes of Harvard Business School has argued, our common way of thinking about white collar crime is often wrong. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
The only federal court to address a similar claim, however, disagreed. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
In fact, as was set forth in the OCA's answer to the petition, the health insurance cause of action must be dismissed for failure to join a necessary party because the real party in interest is the president of the Civil Service Commission, who negotiates health insurance packages on behalf of the Judiciary. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:39 pm
Vial (1986) and People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
Clinic students will work closely with the professor and local attorneys, community leaders, government officials, and elected officials to provide needed legal services.In the clinic, students will perform a variety of tasks. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
The number of annual federal court securities class action lawsuit filings was elevated during the period 2017-2019 by a flood of federal court merger objection class action lawsuits. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
At the same time, the SEC wanted an outside contractor to process the data in order to facilitate the Commission’s oversight. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
”[22] This calls attention to how allegations of over-breadth raise issues of first, fair notice and second, respect for legality – two of the most serious problems caused by the phenomenon of over-criminalisation.[23] Prosecutorial discretion may be a source of help in minimizing the injustice otherwise caused by over-inclusive statutes.[24] Clearly then, there is a reliance on prosecutorial discretion, however the prosecutors are given no ethical public… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
”[22] This calls attention to how allegations of over-breadth raise issues of first, fair notice and second, respect for legality – two of the most serious problems caused by the phenomenon of over-criminalisation.[23] Prosecutorial discretion may be a source of help in minimizing the injustice otherwise caused by over-inclusive statutes.[24] Clearly then, there is a reliance on prosecutorial discretion, however the prosecutors are given no ethical public… [read post]
