Search for: "Commonwealth v. Means (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 61 - 80 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am by Irma Abella
However, Justice Sotomayor has written two dissenting opinions relying upon Wiggins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall prior posts and articles here on the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
  At that point we had not yet read the Court’s entire 137-page opinion, Tincher v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am by Steven Ballard
 I had expected, like my colleague Jonathan Eaton, the Court to rule differently, or for at least some of the justices to offer a dissenting opinion. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
This anxiety about a representative – or reflective – judiciary was captured most vividly in the Supreme Court’s decision in R.D.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
(By parentage I mean the ultimate source of the opinion texts it offers, not the intermediary from which the database host may have acquired them in digital form or the citation data it may have added to them.) [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Guest, 383 U.S. 745, 86 S.Ct. 1170, 16 L.Ed.2d 239 (1966) (concurring and dissenting opinions).) [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Commonwealth, Department of Insurance (Koken), 889 A.2d 550 (Pa. 2005). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Commonwealth, Department of Insurance (Koken), 889 A.2d 550 (Pa. 2005). [read post]