Search for: "Connecticut Distributors, Inc"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
http://j.st/qD9 The Glenelk Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm
Grainger Inc., a national hardware distributor headquartered in Illinois, and Ohio-based RPM International Inc. and its subsidiary, Tremco Inc., a roofing supplies and services firm, failed to disclose discounts given to their commercial customers, which resulted in government customers paying higher prices. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:40 am
See NBTY, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:40 am
See NBTY, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Health Care Provider Risks When Ordering and Billing Chelation Therapy Services (January 25, 2024): Although chelation therapy[1] has played an important role in mainstream medicine for many years,[2] it is still considered by many clinicians and regulators to fall within the category of "Complementary and Alternative Medicine. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am
Gallo & Co., Inc., v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:30 am
The dispute recalls a similar squabble last year when Connecticut told Shelton Brothers it had problems with its Seriously Bad Elf ale.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This legal newswire is brought to you by ALM's law.com http://www.law.com/service/aboutlaw.shtml
Copyright 2006 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
The defendants also concealed the final end-use and end-users of the goods from manufacturers, distributors, shippers, and freight forwarders in the United States and elsewhere, as well as from U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
The defendants also concealed the final end-use and end-users of the goods from manufacturers, distributors, shippers, and freight forwarders in the United States and elsewhere, as well as from U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
She named as defendants Bayer Corporation (a Pennsylvania citizen), Bayer Health, LLC (a citizen of Delaware and Connecticut), Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
— EPA News Release, September 22, 2009 EPA settled with EMCO Chemical Distributors Inc., North Chicago, Ill., on hazardous chemical release reporting violations. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
Orson, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Trees, Inc.). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals in Dallas said distributor JTW Medical Products Inc. was acting outside the scope of its contract with a health care provider when its president allegedly gave a patient's husband faulty information. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:18 am
Next, we turn to McKesson, which attracted a derivative lawsuit resulting from its role as a major distributor of opioids. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
– EPA News Release, March 23, 2010 Automotive & Industrial Distributors has agreed to pay the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
The number of ill people reported from each state is as follows: Alabama (1), Alaska (17), Arizona (129), Arkansas (13), California (232), Colorado (19), Connecticut (1), Florida (1), Hawaii (1), Idaho (24), Illinois (9), Indiana (5), Iowa (7), Kansas (2), Kentucky (1), Louisiana (5), Maryland (1), Minnesota (40), Missouri (14), Montana (16), Nebraska (8), Nevada (16), New Hampshire (1), New Mexico (32), New York (6), North Dakota (8), Ohio (3), Oklahoma (13), Oregon (22), Pennsylvania (2),… [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm
People (and corporations if you do not quite agree with some who do not see the difference) should know what the rules are and how they are going to be enforced and that they will be enforced consistently and fairly. _____ [1] In 1998 in what was the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating Federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for s [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
Glock, Inc. (9th Cir. 2009), for example, plaintiffs argued that the gun manufacturers’ marketing practices constituted a public nuisance under California law because such conduct “significantly interferes with the public safety, health or peace. [read post]
