Search for: "Construction Service Company v. the United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am by Abbie Peterson
Headquartered in Seattle, Washington, Weyerhaeuser is one of the world’s largest private owners of timberlands, owning or controlling nearly 12.4 million acres in the United States and managing 14 million acres in Canada. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, “[i]n In the United States federal courts, magistrate judges are appointed to assist United States district court judges in the performance of their duties. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Category: Claim Construction    By: Christian Hannon, Contributor    TitleMicrosoft Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
   First, he argues that his service as President from 2017 to 2021 did not bring him within the operation of Section 3 in the first instance because Section 3 does not expressly refer to the President and because the presidency is not an office “of the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:51 pm
Allstate Insurance Company, et al., Case No. 06-4091, filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, names eight insurance companies and five insurance adjusting companies as defendants. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am by Etta Lanum
European Cmty., arguing that statutory “focus” is an immaterial consideration in an instance where all the relevant conduct occurred outside the United States. [read post]
Though this occurred in the U.K., had it occurred in the United States a court may have found that Lisson Gallery had actual or constructive notice of the Terms of Service because they were on the front page of the browsing website. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:00 am by Ravi S. Nagi
   BoltNagi PC is one of the largest firms in the United States Virgin Islands and has experienced legal professionals to assist companies in the U.S. [read post]