Search for: "Consumer Opinion LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 2,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 3:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Commentary: We regularly receive inquiries relating to postings on consumer review websites. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
DCH Temecula Imports LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 13, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two) held that the CLRA's no-waiver provision (Civ. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 5:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Now that Plaintiff has uncovered and exposed Defendants’ unlawful deeds, Consumer Opinion LLC respectfully requests that this Court discipline them for those misdeeds. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Specifically, Justice Strauss finds that the petitioners fail to make any showing that the LLC "can no longer meet its business purpose regarding the intake of consumer database," and also fail to make any "showing that the company is financially unfeasible. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
The Motion accordingly is granted on a final basis to the extent set forth in this opinion and order. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:58 pm by Mark F. Anderson
Today, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in a FCRA case, Syed v M-I, LLC  that involves background reports employers obtain on prospective employees. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:39 am by Phyllis H. Marcus
In the first FTC case to challenge a company’s failure to post negative reviews, the FTC has reached a proposed settlement agreement with the online fashion retailer, Fashion Nova, LLC, prohibiting the retailer from suppressing negative reviews and requiring the company to pay $4.2 million for harm suffered by consumers. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:08 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Thursday in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:41 pm
President Ken Shigley's opinion is that lawyers who conduct themselves in this manner poorly serve the consumers of legal services, unfairly compete against law-abiding attorneys who follow the rules, and degrade both the legal profession and the justice system. [read post]