Search for: "Converse, Inc. v. International Trade Commission" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 6:45 am
Bryan Wilson of Morrison & Foerster's  Palo Alto office spoke about the pros and cons of litigating a trade secrets claim before the International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
International Trade Commission confirmed that the ITC has jurisdiction to address trade secret claims, even when the alleged wrongful conduct occurs in a foreign country. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:35 am by Kara OBrien
  At the same time, the SEC, working closely with criminal prosecutors, continued to pursue insider trading investigations based on recorded conversations and cooperating witnesses. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent Nos. 5,827,698 (the “ ‘698 patent”) and 6,040,160 (the “ ‘160 patent”).[8]  In April of 2006, Ajinomoto filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) alleging that the importation of various lysine feed products was a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, 19 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIMITED and STANCHART SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Amicus brief of Paralyzed Veterans of America Amicus brief of the United Spinal Association Title: Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
Although I’ve never met or otherwise interacted with Erin Baldwin, I have certainly seen Erin Baldwin’s blog about me before, although it has been many months since she has come up in conversation. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP)   Austria Austria: opposition… [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
” The purported “study” is really a summary of conversations with 26 people identified as whistleblowers in 17 federal qui tam cases against pharmaceutical manufactures that were settled between January 2001 and March 2009. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– Business Wire, May 4, 2010 Navistar International Corporation /quotes/comstock/13*! [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]