Search for: "Conyer v. United States"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
Cavel International v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:54 am
Hyde United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Reauthorization Act, S. 2731Summary of Changes in the Bill as Expected to Pass the Senate06/26/2008
Fact Sheet: United States Education Cooperation with VietnamPrepared by the State Department06/26/2008
Legislative Text of a Bill to Increase Global Security for the United States and the International Community by Reducing the Number of… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:47 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Clement, Solicitor General for the Unites States Department of Justice filed an Amicus Brief on behalf of big business. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 6:36 am
You can read more about the ACLU’s work to end racial injustice in the United States at www.aclu.org/racialjustice/index.html [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
Amici had expected the Solicitor General to accept the recommendation of the Securities and Exchange Commission that the United States file an amicus brief in support of Petitioner to urge the Court to follow the Commission’s long-standing interpretation of the statutory and regulatory provisions at issue in this case. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
The brief addressing this question, a concept known as scheme liability, was filed in support of the investors in the Stoneridge case.The brief noted that the Solicitor General rejected the SEC's specific recommendation that the United States file an amicus brief in support of investors and urge the Court to follow the Commission's long-standing interpretation of the statutory and regulatory provisions at issue. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
