Search for: "Cook v. Downs et al" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 11:24 am by Robert Kreisman
Takeda, et al., which was the first federal trial over claims that Actos causes bladder cancer. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Constantine Dellis, D.O., Associates in Nephrology S.C., et al., No. 07 L 910 consol. w/13 L 3360 (Cook County, Ill.) [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Carl Custer
References: American Public Health Association, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:28 am by David DePaolo
Cook, and the Eastern District Court of Appeals came to a similar conclusion in the case of Amesquita et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:02 am by Walter Olson
Primer on “severability”: would ObamaCare fall if individual mandate struck down? [read post]