Search for: "Coon v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  A joint EIS/EIR (EIR) was prepared by federal lead agency Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the United States Forest Service (USFS), and state lead agency Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (Air District). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
It is in the national economic (and also the national security) interest of the United States to encourage manufacturing companies to invest. [read post]
Many – including the Solicitor General on behalf of the United States – had urged the Court to hear the Athena case. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am by Florian Mueller
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Fortress's first motion to dismiss Apple and Intel's complaint, but also allowed the plaintiffs to amend the complaint. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am by Ilya Somin
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm by Alex Moss
And virtually none of the applications originating in China are “triadic patents” (patents filed jointly in the patent offices of Japan, the United States, and European Union), which are widely considered “the gold standard” for patent protection. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Damich, Senior Judge, United States Court of Federal ClaimsDownload TestimonyDamich was chief IP counsel for Senate Judiciary at the time; not providing views of judiciary but recollections as staffer. [read post]