Search for: "Cooper v. Retirement Board"
Results 61 - 80
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
In the next four year, John Paul Stevens, 88, and Ginsburg, 75, are thought to be likely to retire. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Retirement Fund, 243 A.3d 417, 437 (Del. 2020)). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Watson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
The U of T fair dealing guidelines from a decade ago were developed in a cooperative collaboration between usually contrasting viewpoints (Casey Chisick and I) under the wise leadership of now retired U of T general counsel Steve Moate. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
As Wilson J. pointed out, in dissent, the mandatory retirement policy was enacted by the university’s Board pursuant to s. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
[A]fter puzzling the profession for 50 years, this famous observation has earned its retirement. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Cooper District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
EMG Advisors,[19] the court, highlighting that the ERISA fiduciary duties were the highest known to the law, held that an investment manager had breached his fiduciary duties for failing to conduct a thorough investigation before investing certain assets belonging to a retirement fund in a complex derivatives scheme.[20] Similarly, in Evanston Bank v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
Coopers and Lybrand, 1978 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 495, at p. 503; Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am
Upon learning that the victim’s parents had written two letters criticizing the university’s handling of the incident, which the dean had simply placed in a general file, the school’s board of regents hired an outside law firm to investigate. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 8:02 am
This prohibition on compensatory fees would exclude fees received as a member of the compensation committee itself and fixed fees received under a retirement plan for prior service to the company. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Post Grant Admin: Cooper v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:21 am
Deputy Workers' Compensation Commissioner Michelle McGovern noted that at the time Gallo met with Mootz, Gallo was collecting more than $5,000 per month in disability benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board, the Social Security Administration and the workers' compensation carrier for Penford. [read post]
