Search for: "Cooper v. Spencer" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
Transocean, 2:10-cv-01222, US District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans) and Cooper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Merpel adds, if there is to be further cooperation and dialogue, can I put in a plea that the Court cooperates further by answering the questions posed by the national court rather than, as sometimes appears to happen, substituting its own? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Eugene Bernat, President) Bay State Animal Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm
[edited to add link to case] In a 3-2 en banc  ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Ben Nelson (PDF 644 KB)Letters Regarding the Location for the New Global Strike Command04/03/2009 Notice: Build America Bonds and Direct Payment Subsidy Implementation (PDF 40 KB)Released by the Internal Revenue Service04/03/2009 Opinion in the Matter of Katherine Varnum, et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
He was also in a lawsuit in Washington State against his brother Jack McDaniel concerning a trust.In McDaniel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Timmerman-Cooper, No. 07-3339 Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where it was not objectively unreasonable for a state court of appeals to find that the use of videoconferencing at petitioner's parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser, and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]