Search for: "Core v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 7,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
 The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Gregory Weber
GAO also noted that the United States Court of Federal Claims recently held in Myriddian, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 (ii) Development of Green Hydrogen Projects inside the Hubs in an integrated manner to allow pooling of resources and achievement of scale (iii) Enhance the cost-competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives vis-a-vis fossil-based alternatives (iv) Maximize production of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives in India within the stated financial support (v) Encourage large-scale utilization and exports of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives (vi)… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
Yet, the EU standard for legal anonymisation is still hotly debated, as illustrated by the recent case of SRB v EDPS now under appeal before the Court of Justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am by Guest Author
  The core claim in their applications is that EPA did not sufficiently explain what might happen if one or more of the states covered by the regulatory program drops out—as has temporarily happened to 12 states due to judicial stays of separate EPA actions concerning those states. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:07 am by Zaid Majiet
In Sibongelenn Radebe v The Aurum Institute (C662/2023) [2023] ZALCCT 66, the court reiterated that when determining urgency, it is critical that the applicant has within their founding affidavit established the background circumstances which make the matter urgent and the core reasoning why substantial relief cannot be attained within the normal prescribed time frame. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]