Search for: "Correction Officer J. May" Results 61 - 80 of 2,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2010, 5:59 pm by carie
Death row inmate's lawsuit alleges that California corrections officials rushed through the reform process, and that the procedure they sent forward is likely to cause pain.By Carol J. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The application was based on an international application that was filed by the original applicant Robert Bosch GmbH under the PCT on 2 May 2005 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as receiving Office, claiming priority of 24 May 2004. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Joseph Hudock of the Pittsburgh office of the law firm of Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Rauch, P.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, when interpreting statements made by the applicant, the Office has to examine the objectively discernable will of the applicant and cannot pin the applicant down to the wording of statements, in particular when this leads to the applicant being adversely affected (see J 6/08 [7]). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:08 am
Under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, investors may bring a private cause of action against corporations and their officers who make materially misleading statements on which the investors rely when buying or selling a security. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The post 2 inmates suspected of murder of another incarcerated man in California prison appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 8:02 am by Allison Tussey
Kelly was a corrections officer for the Westchester County Department of Corrections in New York. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Therefore the correction of the EPR on 28 November 2008 is not to be impugned on that account. [5] Pursuant to Article 27(2)(ii) PCT, Rule 51bis.1(a)(ii) PCT once the processing of the international application in the national/regional phase has started the designated office may require assignments and additional documents relating to the entitlement to apply for or be granted a patent, provided that the national law provides for a respective legal basis. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
As counsel for Velocys accepted, Velocys would not be able to make such amendments in the context of EPO opposition proceedings by virtue of Rule 80 of the EPC Implementing Regulations: see T 993/07 Fisher-Rosemount/Field device management system(unreported, 20 May 2010) cited in Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (7th edition) at p. 899. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Attorney General's Office Releases Guidance on <i>303 Creative</i> appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
The Office denied the request for correction, finding that the mistake was not material. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:44 am by FHH Law
Again, Section 15.407(j) requires the preparation of a letter acknowledging responsibility for correcting interference. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 am by Mark Astarita
  But JPMS failed to correct the misstatement on each of those occasions.It wasn’t until May 2012 – more than three years after it was first made – that the misstatement was corrected by JPMS in some marketing materials. [read post]