Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 61 - 80 of 48,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
The Texas Supreme Court had occasion in 1996, in Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:15 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent decision of Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse S.A. v International Bank of St. [read post]
22 May 2023, 8:54 am by Commentary:
On April 18, 2023, the court heard oral arguments in Groff v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Simon Gibbs
What steps in costs litigation are (non-Costs Lawyer) law costs draftsmen able to undertake? [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 10:23 pm by Simon Gibbs
I previously commented on the Coulson J, in CIP Properties (AIPT) Ltd v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd & Ors (Costs No. 2) [2015] EWHC 481 (TCC), as to the suggestion a defendant might try to submit a knowingly low costs … Continue reading → [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 11:06 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker has given definitive guidance as to how bills should be divided in the case of BP v Cardiff & Vale University Local Health Board [2015] EWHC B13: Divided between periods where different proportionality test … Continue reading → [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:09 pm by Simon Gibbs
(This post was written before the council of the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen responded to the post Costs Counsel v Costs Lawyers (click link) and should be read in conjunction with that. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 10:46 am by Giles Peaker
Parker, R (On the Application Of) v Bashir & Anor (2022) EWHC 358 (Admin) A judicial review of a Magistrates Court decision on costs in a section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
” • In the case of Shirely v Caswell [2001] 1 Costs LR 1, Chadwick, LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, stated: “The costs of issues abandoned, or not pursued at trial, ought, prima facie, to be disallowed against the party incurring them on an assessment of the costs of that party by the costs judge - because, again prima facie, they are costs which have been unnecessarily incurred in the litigation. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:23 am by Michael Fitzgibbon
It is only in exceptional circumstances that an arbitrator may order costs, see Community Addiction and Mental Health Services of Haldimand-Norfolk v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:53 pm by Simon Gibbs
" However, I am grateful to Friston’s Civil Costs – Law and Practice for reminding me of the views of Evans J in Johnson v Reed Corrugated Cases Ltd (1990) Costs LR, Core vol 180 at 185. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm by Simon Gibbs
  One useful starting point is Seray-Wurie v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWCA Civ 909. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:56 pm by Simon Gibbs
Today I continue my examination of the calls for the Costs Lawyer Standards Board (CLSB) to introduce entity regulation of costs firms, in light of the decision in Kynaston v Carroll [2011] EWHC 2179. [read post]