Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin" Results 61 - 80 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are premature at… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing  disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Circuit Court vacated the district court's judgment and remanded the matter to the lower court for further proceedings.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 A.D.2d 863, aff'd 63 NY2d 643, the Appellate Division opined that threatening to do what the appointing authority has a right to do – in this instance filing  disciplinary charges against Rychlick if he refused to resign from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Case law indicates that in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as an excessively lengthy or intense questioning, courts will not deem the individual's resignation to have been obtained under duress.In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeal addressed a situation where an employee was offered the option of resigning from his position or having formal disciplinary charges filed against him. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”** Law enforcement personnel including correction officers are public officers subject to the provisions of Public Officers Law §30(1)(e) [see Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03535.htm [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]