Search for: "Court Reporters v. Rules"
Results 61 - 80
of 41,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court affirmed a US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit [official website] ruling, which held [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that a challenger to a patent claim must prove invalidity by clear and... [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:13 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
5 May 2003, 11:20 am
The Court also handed down a brief per curiam ruling in Kaupp v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm
No New Jersey court has ruled on this issue, although Khazin v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:14 am
Supreme Court took on a relatively rare original-jurisdiction matter with the case of Montana v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday that time limits under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) [28 USC § 2401(b)] are subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
The court denied the appeals without comment, letting stand lower court rulings that had upheld the bans [JURIST report] as constitutional. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] issued a ruling [opinion, PDF] on Tuesday in Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that a federal advisory committee appointed by the FDA to issue a report consistent with the agency's new authority over the sale of tobacco products was illegally constituted. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:50 am
B (No. 2) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a judge at a preparatory hearing made a ruling which was overturned on appeal and a differently constituted Court of Appeal in a subsequent case held that the earlier case had been decided per incuriam, the judge was bound to follow the later decision in the interests of justice as a whole and because any rulings of law made at preparatory hearings had correctly to reflect the law which would govern… [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
The post Decoding the New Rules after the California Supreme Court’s Ruling in <em>Adolph v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Gillespie County [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report], in which the Court ruled 8-1 that a person accused of a felony has the right to a lawyer at a probable cause hearing before a magistrate judge. [read post]
18 Jan 2006, 3:02 am
The court considered [JURIST report] the case of Susan Hallock who first sued the federal [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:08 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Mohawk Industries v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:04 am
The Court's decision came in New Jersey v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:03 am
Piccadilly Cafeterias [Duke Law backgrounder; JURIST report], in which the Court ruled that a federal bankruptcy code provision [11 USC §1146(a) text] exempting certain court-confirmed transfers from state and local transfer taxes applies only after the [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:21 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
15 May 2006, 3:11 am
MercExchange [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court ruled that federal courts need not automatically issue a permanent injunction after finding that there has been patent infringement. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Florida v. [read post]
